Experience is labeled.
Workflow recommendations come from implementation work in a school concession setting. We do not turn one school’s process into a universal rule.
Built from the open window
Real concession work.
Documented clearly.
ConcessionStand.ai grew from a Booster Club taking responsibility for a high-school football concession stand in Jacksonville, Florida. The product and operating library give the next person a system they can understand and use.
Experience
Why this work is first-hand.
We started with a live school fundraiser in Jacksonville, Florida. It had home-game schedules, parent shifts, teenage volunteers, starting and closing physical inventory, donated products, waste, complimentary items, Tap to Pay phones, QR ordering, official attendance, weather, and a Board that needed a clean explanation after the crowd left.
That work exposed the handoffs ordinary point-of-sale tools leave unresolved: who confirms the home game, who can open the stand, how adults receive temporary payment access, what a released shift does to capacity, how donated stock is counted, and what must be reviewed before a game is locked. Those questions shape the platform and our published guidance.
Editorial standards
How a field guide earns trust.
Our operating library is written for adults making real school, volunteer, inventory, and fundraising decisions.
Primary sources come first.
Payment capabilities link to provider documentation. Food-safety guidance links to public-health authorities. School controls link to published school-system policies.
Local authority stays local.
Permits, taxes, district policy, food rules, and volunteer requirements vary. Our checklists help teams ask the right question; they do not replace the responsible authority.
Product claims are testable.
We describe workflows that exist in the working product or clearly label them as planned. We do not invent customer totals, savings, testimonials, or performance results.
Dates and changes are visible.
Guides show their review date. We revisit provider and public-source claims when the linked rules or the software changes materially.
Corrections are welcome.
If a source has changed or a passage is unclear, email [email protected]. We review the evidence and correct material errors.
Scope and accountability
Our publishing rules
We explain the operational logic, show our sources, identify assumptions, and tell a school when a provider or local authority owns the answer.
We do not fabricate case-study numbers, present software as a food-safety certification, imply a payment partnership that does not exist, or hide our commercial interest in the platform.
Bring us the messy version.
Tell us how the stand works today. We’ll start with one real game and make each operational decision visible.